RE: [gnso-ppsc] CONSENSUS CALL ON PPSC CHARTER

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Forgot to add that I support the charter.

Tim 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [gnso-ppsc] CONSENSUS CALL ON PPSC CHARTER
From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, January 12, 2009 5:42 pm
To: "PPSC" <gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx>

One possibility is to interpret the Implementation Plan to have intended
that one or both would be members, but that in the aggregate (including
the chair and/or vice chair) there would be only one from each
costituency as a member of the SC and one NCA as a member. So
regardless, there are initially only seven members.

Tim 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc] CONSENSUS CALL ON PPSC CHARTER
From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, January 12, 2009 4:27 pm
To: PPSC <gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx>



On 12 Jan 2009, at 13:41, Avri Doria wrote:

> +1


I personally am fine with the charter and thus said 'me too', but then 
I remembered that in the last council meeting, the OSC charter was 
cycled back to the OSC for the following that may be relevant to our 
charter:

> GNSO council chair and/or vice chair

the question was, should this not be

> GNSO council chair or vice chair


Just like I am in the PPSC with Chuck as alternate and Chuck is in OSC 
with me as Alternate, only one of us is a member.

One question that did come up was whether someone could be in the 
committee as chair or v-chair and have someone else from their 
constituency/grouping. In this case we have chosen differently - in 
PPSC i am wearing both the NCA and Chair hat (in consensus there is 
not double vote) while in OSC there is a rep from the PPSC. Both 
options seem valid, and if Terry as the third NCA wanted to 
participate in the committee, I assume this would be within the rules.


The other change related to WT rules and in looking at our current 
draft i think we may already be in compliance with the comments.

a.