FW: [gnso-ppsc] Action items & timeline

["Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Marika,

 

In response to this, my key issue is to make sure that the WG rules ensure
that mail list participants are treated equally as those who participate on
calls.  This means no meaningful decisions can ever be taken on WG calls,
but must always be subject to list discussion and polling.  Reasons for this
are cultural and practical, as very few people have time and inclination to
participate consistently on WG calls, particularly non-English speakers.  My
read of the current report does not make any of this clear, but I think it
must be clear, and not subject to later revision by any particular WG.

 

I hope this preserves the issue for further discussion by the PPSC if any is
necessary, else for revision of the current report to make this clear.

 

Thanks,

Mike

 

Mike Rodenbaugh

RODENBAUGH LAW

tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087

 <http://rodenbaugh.com/> http://rodenbaugh.com

 

From: owner-gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Marika Konings
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 3:12 AM
To: gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-ppsc] Action items & timeline

 

Dear All,

Based on the meeting yesterday, please find hereunder the main action items
and proposed timeline going forward:



* At that point in time the PPSC will determine whether further issues need
to be discussed with the WG-WT and/or an additional public comment period is
required.

As a reminder, the latest version of the GNSO Working Group Guidelines as
well as the version that includes the public comments received and how these
were addressed by the WG-WT can be found on the PPSC wiki
(https://st.icann.org/icann-ppsc/).

With best regards,

Marika