Re: [gnso-ppsc] Action items & timeline

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with the basic principle you are putting forward Mike, but take 
exception with the idea that "no meaningful discussion should ever take place 
on the calls". I think the basic principle of any WG should be that we never 
limit discussion because some people cannot make a call (or have time to read 
an email - it can work that way as well). Otherwise it will become difficult to 
ever make real progress.

Stéphane

Envoyé de mon iPhone4

Le 2 août 2010 à 17:35, "Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> Hi Marika,
> 
>  
> 
> In response to this, my key issue is to make sure that the WG rules ensure 
> that mail list participants are treated equally as those who participate on 
> calls.  This means no meaningful decisions can ever be taken on WG calls, but 
> must always be subject to list discussion and polling.  Reasons for this are 
> cultural and practical, as very few people have time and inclination to 
> participate consistently on WG calls, particularly non-English speakers.  My 
> read of the current report does not make any of this clear, but I think it 
> must be clear, and not subject to later revision by any particular WG.
> 
>  
> 
> I hope this preserves the issue for further discussion by the PPSC if any is 
> necessary, else for revision of the current report to make this clear.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mike
> 
>  
> 
> Mike Rodenbaugh
> 
> RODENBAUGH LAW
> 
> tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087
> 
> http://rodenbaugh.com
> 
>  
> 
> From: owner-gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> Of Marika Konings
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 3:12 AM
> To: gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-ppsc] Action items & timeline
> 
>  
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> Based on the meeting yesterday, please find hereunder the main action items 
> and proposed timeline going forward:
> 
> 
> 
> * At that point in time the PPSC will determine whether further issues need 
> to be discussed with the WG-WT and/or an additional public comment period is 
> required.
> 
> As a reminder, the latest version of the GNSO Working Group Guidelines as 
> well as the version that includes the public comments received and how these 
> were addressed by the WG-WT can be found on the PPSC wiki 
> (https://st.icann.org/icann-ppsc/).
> 
> With best regards,
> 
> Marika