RE: [gnso-ppsc] Action items & timeline

["Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I said “decisions”, not “discussion”.

 

Mike Rodenbaugh

RODENBAUGH LAW

tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087

 <http://rodenbaugh.com/> http://rodenbaugh.com

 

From: owner-gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 2:41 PM
To: <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marika Konings; <gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc] Action items & timeline

 

I agree with the basic principle you are putting forward Mike, but take 
exception with the idea that "no meaningful discussion should ever take place 
on the calls". I think the basic principle of any WG should be that we never 
limit discussion because some people cannot make a call (or have time to read 
an email - it can work that way as well). Otherwise it will become difficult to 
ever make real progress.

 

Stéphane

Envoyé de mon iPhone4


Le 2 août 2010 à 17:35, "Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

Hi Marika,

 

In response to this, my key issue is to make sure that the WG rules ensure that 
mail list participants are treated equally as those who participate on calls.  
This means no meaningful decisions can ever be taken on WG calls, but must 
always be subject to list discussion and polling.  Reasons for this are 
cultural and practical, as very few people have time and inclination to 
participate consistently on WG calls, particularly non-English speakers.  My 
read of the current report does not make any of this clear, but I think it must 
be clear, and not subject to later revision by any particular WG.

 

I hope this preserves the issue for further discussion by the PPSC if any is 
necessary, else for revision of the current report to make this clear.

 

Thanks,

Mike

 

Mike Rodenbaugh

RODENBAUGH LAW

tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087

http://rodenbaugh.com <http://rodenbaugh.com/> 

 

From: owner-gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Marika Konings
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 3:12 AM
To: gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-ppsc] Action items & timeline

 

Dear All,

Based on the meeting yesterday, please find hereunder the main action items and 
proposed timeline going forward:



* At that point in time the PPSC will determine whether further issues need to 
be discussed with the WG-WT and/or an additional public comment period is 
required.

As a reminder, the latest version of the GNSO Working Group Guidelines as well 
as the version that includes the public comments received and how these were 
addressed by the WG-WT can be found on the PPSC wiki 
(https://st.icann.org/icann-ppsc/).

With best regards,

Marika