Re: [gnso-ppsc] Revised Language for 2 outstanding issues in Working Group Guidelines

["J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>]

I am fine with this.  Others?

J. Scott
j. scott evans - senior legal director, global brand and trademarks - Yahoo! 
Inc. - 408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx




From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2010 10:53:16 AM
Subject: RE: [gnso-ppsc] Revised Language for 2 outstanding issues in Working 
Group Guidelines


J. Scott,

As I said, the second revised section looks fine to me, but I would like
to suggest rewording the first on to something like the following:

"Based upon the WG's needs, the Chair may direct that WG participants do
not have to have their name explicitly associated with any Full
Consensus or Consensus view/position. However, in all other cases and
in those cases where a group member represents the minority viewpoint,
their name must be explicitly linked, especially in those cases where
polls where taken."

I believe it doesn't change the intent but makes it more explicit.

Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-ppsc] Revised Language for 2 outstanding issues in
> Working Group Guidelines
> From: "J. Scott Evans" 
> Date: Wed, December 08, 2010 3:59 pm
> To: PPSC 
> Cc: Marika Konings 
> 
> 
> Dear All:
>  
> I apologize for the delay in getting this back to you.  I have attached a 
> Word document containing my suggested revisions to the 2 sections we 
> discussed in our call on December 1, 2010.  Please let me have your feedback.
>  
> J. Scott
>  
> j. scott evans - senior legal director, global brand and trademarks - Yahoo! 
> Inc. - 408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>