RE: [gnso-ppsc] Revised Language for 2 outstanding issues in Working Group Guidelines

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

J. Scott,

As I said, the second revised section looks fine to me, but I would like
to suggest rewording the first on to something like the following:

"Based upon the WG's needs, the Chair may direct that WG participants do
not have to have their name explicitly associated with any Full
Consensus or Consensus view/position.  However, in all other cases and
in those cases where a group member represents the minority viewpoint,
their name must be explicitly linked, especially in those cases where
polls where taken."

I believe it doesn't change the intent but makes it more explicit.

Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-ppsc] Revised Language for 2 outstanding issues in
> Working Group Guidelines
> From: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, December 08, 2010 3:59 pm
> To: PPSC <gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> Dear All:
>  
> I apologize for the delay in getting this back to you.  I have attached a 
> Word document containing my suggested revisions to the 2 sections we 
> discussed in our call on December 1, 2010.  Please let me have your feedback.
>  
> J. Scott
>  
> j. scott evans - senior legal director, global brand and trademarks - Yahoo! 
> Inc. - 408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>