Re: [gnso-ppsc] Revised Language for 2 outstanding issues in Working Group Guidelines

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

The council needs to approve sending things out for public comment?
Since when?

a.

On 13 Dec 2010, at 08:46, Neuman, Jeff wrote:

> Thanks.  
> 
> Marika/Margie - Can you all pull together the final version incorporating all 
> of this language and then I will call for a formal consensus call among the 
> PPSC for approval.  We will then draft a motion to propose to the GNSO 
> Council sending this out for public comment as we discussed.
> 
> Thanks everyone.
> 
> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> 
> 
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete 
> the original message.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 7:31 PM
> To: gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc] Revised Language for 2 outstanding issues in Working 
> Group Guidelines
> 
> 
> sure.
> a.
> 
> On 9 Dec 2010, at 18:32, J. Scott Evans wrote:
> 
>> I am fine with this.  Others?
>> 
>> J. Scott
>> 
>> j. scott evans - senior legal director, global brand and trademarks - Yahoo! 
>> Inc. - 408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx
>> 
>> 
>> From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx
>> Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2010 10:53:16 AM
>> Subject: RE: [gnso-ppsc] Revised Language for 2 outstanding issues in 
>> Working Group Guidelines
>> 
>> J. Scott,
>> 
>> As I said, the second revised section looks fine to me, but I would like
>> to suggest rewording the first on to something like the following:
>> 
>> "Based upon the WG's needs, the Chair may direct that WG participants do
>> not have to have their name explicitly associated with any Full
>> Consensus or Consensus view/position. However, in all other cases and
>> in those cases where a group member represents the minority viewpoint,
>> their name must be explicitly linked, especially in those cases where
>> polls where taken."
>> 
>> I believe it doesn't change the intent but makes it more explicit.
>> 
>> Tim
>> 
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: [gnso-ppsc] Revised Language for 2 outstanding issues in
>>> Working Group Guidelines
>>> From: "J. Scott Evans" 
>>> Date: Wed, December 08, 2010 3:59 pm
>>> To: PPSC 
>>> Cc: Marika Konings 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Dear All:
>>> 
>>> I apologize for the delay in getting this back to you.  I have attached a 
>>> Word document containing my suggested revisions to the 2 sections we 
>>> discussed in our call on December 1, 2010.  Please let me have your 
>>> feedback.
>>> 
>>> J. Scott
>>> 
>>> j. scott evans - senior legal director, global brand and trademarks - 
>>> Yahoo! Inc. - 408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
>