RE: [gnso-pro-wg] Online polling results: summary

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

<div>
Liz, thank you for putting this together. My only suggestion would be
that it might be useful to see how the responses break down by category of the 
respondents.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>
All, I apologize but will not be able to join the call again today. I do
have suggested recommendations that are currently being vetted internally and 
will submit those to the list as soon as that's complete.<BR></div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Best,</div>
<div><BR>Tim <BR></div>
<div   name="wmMessageComp"><BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px 
solid" webmail="1">-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: [gnso-pro-wg] 
Online polling results: &nbsp;summary<BR>From: Liz Williams 
&lt;liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Date: Wed, May 09, 2007 3:00 am<BR>To: 
gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx<BR><BR><PRE>Colleagues

Ahead of tonight's meeting, please review this link to the poll  
results.  <A 
href="http://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=umTLyTqHJjKfWqTxYwzL"; 
target=_blank>http://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=umTLyTqHJjKfWqTxYwzL</A>

I am currently verifying some of the 41 respondents  to ensure the  
veracity of the responses.  The following caveats apply to the  
summary -- the 43 responses (41 online and 2 offline) is not a  
statistically significant sample of a defined group; the  
questionnaire was designed to elicit top line summary responses to a  
wide range of questions; no special preparation was made for the  
summary to follow robust survey methodology.


Summary -- Section I

More than half identified themselves as rights owner representatives  
or IPR owners; only 5 identified themselves as registrars or registries

Note in question 6  that there is an almost even split between an IP  
claim and the use of sunrise registrations.

Note that in question 7 the rights people sought to protect.

Note in question 14 the even spilt between those respondents who  
owned or didn't own defensive registrations

Of particular interest is the section on defensive registrations --  
note the low levels of defensive registrations as a percentage of  
domain name portfolios

[[I did a random selection of the word "rainyweather" (because it's  
raining in Brussels today) on the MelbourneIT (because that came into  
my head first) website across info, .co.nz, .eu, .com.au, .org  
and .biz.  The prices of a one year registration are, for most of the  
TLDs, about $35 per year on that site.  It would be helpful to have  
some actual numbers on costs of registrations for a portfolio of  
registrations to see the cost impact of defensive registrations.]]

Summary -- Section II

Note the level of implementation budget expenditure on sunrise  
mechanisms and the other responses in that section which do not  
include many registrars and registries.

Speak to you all on 9 May to resolve how to represent the materials  
in the Report.  I haven't seen any correspondence on proposed  
guidelines as yet.

Liz
.....................................................

Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob




</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>