Re: [gnso-pro-wg] Proposed Principles for discussion

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

After last night's call, I must admit I find Tim's set of principles  
much easier to understand and accept.  While I think there is a lot  
of good content in the set Kristina provided, I think their  
complexity brings in a fair amount of ambiguity.

Though I am not sure that I fully understand 6 in Tim's set:

> 6.   The fees associated with a legal rights protection mechanism  
> should reflect its scope. For example, the fees associated with  
> Defensive Registrations may be significantly higher than those for  
> a Sunrise process where the scope is limited to exact matches of  
> registered trademarks only.

BTW, apologies for not participating much during the call, I was  
having telephone issues.  Finally got it solved at the end of the call.

a.

On 14 maj 2007, at 23.00, Tim Ruiz wrote:

> Where are the principles I submitted last week? The *principles* in  
> this chart are worded like policy recommendations, and as such,  
> most are completely out of scope of this WG's SOW.
>
> Tim
>
>
> -