RE: [gnso-pro-wg] Final Report: Last call

["Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Tim on #2.  I don't support #2 without the change.

I'm ok with #3 either as Tim suggests below or as is.

Thanks.

Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 6:14 AM
To: Liz Williams
Cc: gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-pro-wg] Final Report: Last call

Liz, thank you for the time and effort you put into this WG and the
report. Regarding section 3: 

1. Agree. 

2. Do not agree. I would agree if it was slightly modified to read: 

"That each new gTLD that uses RPMs should adopt..." 

3. Do not agree. Would agree with this version: 

"That the Legal Rights on which a party bases its participation and
seeks to protect in an RPM MUST be subjected to actual authentication,
regardless of whether such rights are challenged." 

4. Agree. 

5. Agree. 

6. Agree.

I realize that it is too late to rehash number 3 above. But the slight
change I suggest to 2 should be fairly uncontroversial. It will be the
new gTLD committee that ulimately decides whether to recommend that all
new gTLDs MUST, MAY, or SHOULD use RPMs. So the slight change to 2 makes
it applicable whichever way they go.


Tim 
 

 -------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-pro-wg] Final Report:  Last call
From: Liz Williams <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, June 01, 2007 2:20 am
To: gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx

Everyone
 
 This is a last call for responses to the Report. In particular, look 
 at section three and let me know ASAP if you support, as an 
 individual, the proposed recommendations. I will be closing off the 
 report ASAP to enable it to be distributed to the GNSO Committee 
 prior to the 7 June conference call.
 
 Liz
 .....................................................
 
 Liz Williams
 Senior Policy Counselor
 ICANN - Brussels
 +32 2 234 7874 tel
 +32 2 234 7848 fax
 +32 497 07 4243 mob