ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-pro-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-pro-wg] Final Report: Last call

  • To: liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-pro-wg] Final Report: Last call
  • From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:40:49 -0700

Thanks Liz. Understood.

Tim
Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail.

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [gnso-pro-wg] Final Report:  Last call
> From: Liz Williams <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, June 01, 2007 9:28 am
> To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> Many thanks Tim
> 
> I am not in a position to re-open the drafting as that would require  
> another round of discussion which we can't do now.
> 
> However, do hold your suggestions for when this will come up at the  
> San Juan meeting and you will also be able to discuss with the Council.
> 
> Liz
> .....................................................
> 
> Liz Williams
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN - Brussels
> +32 2 234 7874 tel
> +32 2 234 7848 fax
> +32 497 07 4243 mob
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 01 Jun 2007, at 12:14, Tim Ruiz wrote:
> 
> > Liz, thank you for the time and effort you put into this WG and the
> > report. Regarding section 3:
> >
> > 1. Agree.
> >
> > 2. Do not agree. I would agree if it was slightly modified to read:
> >
> > "That each new gTLD that uses RPMs should adopt..."
> >
> > 3. Do not agree. Would agree with this version:
> >
> > "That the Legal Rights on which a party bases its participation and
> > seeks to protect in an RPM MUST be subjected to actual authentication,
> > regardless of whether such rights are challenged."
> >
> > 4. Agree.
> >
> > 5. Agree.
> >
> > 6. Agree.
> >
> > I realize that it is too late to rehash number 3 above. But the slight
> > change I suggest to 2 should be fairly uncontroversial. It will be the
> > new gTLD committee that ulimately decides whether to recommend that  
> > all
> > new gTLDs MUST, MAY, or SHOULD use RPMs. So the slight change to 2  
> > makes
> > it applicable whichever way they go.
> >
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> >  -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [gnso-pro-wg] Final Report:  Last call
> > From: Liz Williams <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Fri, June 01, 2007 2:20 am
> > To: gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Everyone
> >
> >  This is a last call for responses to the Report. In particular, look
> >  at section three and let me know ASAP if you support, as an
> >  individual, the proposed recommendations. I will be closing off the
> >  report ASAP to enable it to be distributed to the GNSO Committee
> >  prior to the 7 June conference call.
> >
> >  Liz
> >  .....................................................
> >
> >  Liz Williams
> >  Senior Policy Counselor
> >  ICANN - Brussels
> >  +32 2 234 7874 tel
> >  +32 2 234 7848 fax
> >  +32 497 07 4243 mob
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy