<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-pro-wg] Final Report: Last call
- To: "'Mike Rodenbaugh'" <mxr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Rosette, Kristina'" <krosette@xxxxxxx>, "'Liz Williams'" <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-pro-wg] Final Report: Last call
- From: "Edmon Chung" <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:37:36 +0800
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
>
> I disagree with #1. Indeed there is already a universal RPM called the
> UDRP, and it must be made more effective to deal with obvious criminal
> activity such as phishing and obvious typosquatting, and applied
> universally across all gTLDs and as many ccTLDs as possible.
I think the idea is that there is no one all encompassing RPM.
UDRP is one part of the many RPMs a gTLD may use. But my interpretation of #1
is that there is no one universal RPM "package" for all gTLDs.
If that is the case, perhaps some rewording would be useful...
Edmon
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|