<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-raa-b] Scheduling RAA Subteam BG Session in Brussels
- To: <gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-b] Scheduling RAA Subteam BG Session in Brussels
- From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:32:15 -0700
#2 sounds best to me. Thanks.
Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
tel/fax: +1 (415) 738-8087
<http://rodenbaugh.com/> http://rodenbaugh.com
From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Hammock, Statton
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 6:36 PM
To: Metalitz, Steven; Michele Neylon :: Blacknight; Margie Milam
Cc: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-b] Scheduling RAA Subteam BG Session in Brussels
I also support option (ii).
Statton
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 7:07 PM
To: Michele Neylon :: Blacknight; Margie Milam
Cc: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-b] Scheduling RAA Subteam BG Session in Brussels
I definitely support option (ii) as well.
Steve Metalitz
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Michele Neylon :: Blacknight
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 5:57 PM
To: Margie Milam
Cc: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-raa-b] Scheduling RAA Subteam BG Session in Brussels
Margie
Thanks for the concise summary
While I was on the call and already expressed very clearly my preference
for option 2 I'd like to take this opportunity to do formally on the
list
Regards
Michele
On 15 Apr 2010, at 22:49, Margie Milam wrote:
> Hi-
>
> Following up on issues raised on today's call, the drafting team
discussed two different approaches for addressing the RAA Amendments
topics in Brussels. The drafting team is considering either (i) a
standard GNSO type workshop, where the Initial Report would be reviewed
with those interested in the topic, or (ii) a large cross-supporting
organization session, where the SO/ACs can participate and share their
perspective, including as one of the topics, inviting law enforcement
and GAC representatives to explain their support for the LEA amendment
topics, and having Registrars explain their concerns with some of the
LEA proposals. If this sub-team supports the approach in (ii), we
would attempt to schedule this on Monday of the ICANN meeting to gather
maximum cross-SO/AC participation. Adopting (ii) would be intended
to serve as a forum to respond to the GAC's endorsement of the LEA
amendments, as well as the significant press that has been focused on
the LEA !
related requests.
>
> The participants on today's call supported (ii) but wanted to get
broader input from those unable to participate on today's call. If
you have a preference on this issue, please respond to the list.
>
> Thanks,
> Margie
>
> ___________
>
> Margie Milam
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN
> ___________
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
US: 213-233-1612
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business
Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|