RE: [gnso-raa-b] Scheduling RAA Subteam BG Session in Brussels

["Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>]

For the record (and in the unlikely event I wasn't clear on the call), I
definitely support option (ii).


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Margie Milam
        Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 5:50 PM
        To: 'gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx'
        Subject: [gnso-raa-b] Scheduling RAA Subteam BG Session in
Brussels 
        
        

        Hi-

        
        Following up on issues raised on today's call, the drafting team
discussed two different approaches for addressing the RAA Amendments
topics in Brussels.      The drafting team is considering either (i) a
standard GNSO type workshop, where the Initial Report would be reviewed
with those interested in the topic, or (ii) a large cross-supporting
organization session, where the SO/ACs can participate and share their
perspective, including as one of the topics, inviting law enforcement
and GAC representatives to explain their support for the LEA amendment
topics, and having Registrars explain their concerns with some of the
LEA proposals.    If this sub-team supports the approach in (ii), we
would attempt to schedule this on Monday of the ICANN meeting to gather
maximum cross-SO/AC participation.     Adopting (ii) would be intended
to serve as a forum to respond to the GAC's endorsement of the LEA
amendments, as well as the significant  press that has been focused on
the LEA related requests.

         

        The participants on today's call supported (ii) but wanted to
get broader input  from those unable to participate on today's call.
If you have a preference on this issue, please respond to the list.

         

        Thanks,

        Margie

         

        ___________

         

        Margie Milam

        Senior Policy Counselor

        ICANN

        ___________