RE: [gnso-raa-b] Scheduling RAA Subteam BG Session in Brussels

["Trachtenberg, Marc H." <MTrachtenberg@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

As do I.

Marc H. Trachtenberg

Winston & Strawn LLP
35 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601-9703

D: +1 (312) 558-7964

M: +1 (773) 677-3305

F: +1 (312) 558-5700

Bio<http://www.winston.com/index.cfm?contentID=24&itemID=15281> | 
VCard<http://www.winston.com/sitefiles/wsvcard/15281.vcf> | 
Email<mailto:mtrachtenberg@xxxxxxxxxxx> | 
www.winston.com<http://www.winston.com>

Follow us on Twitter twitter.com/winstonadlaw<http://twitter.com/winstonadlaw>

[cid:image001.jpg@01CADD58.7ACF7FC0]
From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Hammock, Statton
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 8:36 PM
To: Metalitz, Steven; Michele Neylon :: Blacknight; Margie Milam
Cc: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-b] Scheduling RAA Subteam BG Session in Brussels


I also support option (ii).



 Statton



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Metalitz, Steven
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 7:07 PM
To: Michele Neylon :: Blacknight; Margie Milam
Cc: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-b] Scheduling RAA Subteam BG Session in Brussels





I definitely support option (ii) as well.



Steve Metalitz



-----Original Message-----

From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] On

Behalf Of Michele Neylon :: Blacknight

Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 5:57 PM

To: Margie Milam

Cc: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: [gnso-raa-b] Scheduling RAA Subteam BG Session in Brussels





Margie



Thanks for the concise summary



While I was on the call and already expressed very clearly my preference

for option 2 I'd like to take this opportunity to do formally on the

list



Regards



Michele



On 15 Apr 2010, at 22:49, Margie Milam wrote:



> Hi-

>

> Following up on issues raised on today's call, the drafting team

discussed two different approaches for addressing the RAA Amendments

topics in Brussels.      The drafting team is considering either (i) a

standard GNSO type workshop, where the Initial Report would be reviewed

with those interested in the topic, or (ii) a large cross-supporting

organization session, where the SO/ACs can participate and share their

perspective, including as one of the topics, inviting law enforcement

and GAC representatives to explain their support for the LEA amendment

topics, and having Registrars explain their concerns with some of the

LEA proposals.    If this sub-team supports the approach in (ii), we

would attempt to schedule this on Monday of the ICANN meeting to gather

maximum cross-SO/AC participation.     Adopting (ii) would be intended

to serve as a forum to respond to the GAC's endorsement of the LEA

amendments, as well as the significant  press that has been focused on

the LEA !

 related requests.

>

> The participants on today's call supported (ii) but wanted to get

broader input  from those unable to participate on today's call.     If

you have a preference on this issue, please respond to the list.

>

> Thanks,

> Margie

>

> ___________

>

> Margie Milam

> Senior Policy Counselor

> ICANN

> ___________



Mr Michele Neylon

Blacknight Solutions

Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection

ICANN Accredited Registrar

http://www.blacknight.com/

http://blog.blacknight.com/

http://mneylon.tel

Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072

US: 213-233-1612

UK: 0844 484 9361

Locall: 1850 929 929

Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090

Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon

-------------------------------

Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business

Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845












The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. Therefore, if 
this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. 
Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. 
Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author.
******************************************************************************
Any tax advice contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot 
be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.