[gnso-raa-b] Follow up from today's call
- To: "Hammock, Statton" <shammock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-raa-b] Follow up from today's call
- From: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 14:12:51 -0700
Subteam B participants,
Thanks to all who participated in our productive call this afternoon.
Since no one from the registrar stakeholder group was on the call today,
it was agreed that our first order of business on our next call will be
discussion of Section 5 of the draft initial report, including Statton's
proposed edits circulated earlier today. This would encompass the
concern raised below regarding a statement in the staff draft memorandum
(which appears in the draft initial report as Annex F).
I was asked to urge the registrar participants to ensure that one of the
RrSG participants in the subteam is able to participate in next week's
call. As a reminder, it will be Monday, May 10 at 2000 UTC.
In addition, I encourage all subteam members to circulate their
comments/edits on the draft initial report as soon as possible. If we
can surface all these by no later than COB Thursday May 6, then it
should be possible for the staff to incorporate them into a revised
draft for circulation in advance of the call next Monday.
Following discussion of Section 5/Annex F, and review of any other edits
to the draft initial report, our meeting on May 10 will include brief
follow-up on planning for the Brussels meeting.
From: Hammock, Statton [mailto:shammock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 2:28 PM
To: Metalitz, Steven; gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Diaz, Paul
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-b] Revised proposal re task 3
Thanks for sending around the proposal last Friday. Attached are my
suggested edits for your consideration. If you have any questions,
please let me know. My apologies, in advance, for also not being able to
attend the call today at 4pm as I originally had planned.
Also, I want to reiterate Tim's point made during our last call that
before the process can move further, we need to resolve the concern
raised by the statement in the Staff's Memo that, "the RAA does not
require a negotiation with Registrars." As expressed last week, the
Registrars strongly disagree with that statement and the RrSG has made
that objection clear to ICANN in written response sent last week.
Finally, I am trying to make time to review Margie's draft report which
I hope to do in the coming days.
Best Regards to All,
Sr. Director, Law, Policy & Business Affairs
P 703-668-5515 M 703-624-5031 <http://www.networksolutions.com>
From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 5:36 PM
Subject: [gnso-raa-b] Revised proposal re task 3
RAA subteam B,
Please see attached proposal re task 3 ("next steps") for discussion on
our call on Monday at 2000 UTC. Of course I look forward to your
comments on the list before then....
Have a good weekend!
<<DRAFT RAA next steps proposal 042910 (2676221).DOC>>