Re: [gnso-raa-b] Comments on Section V and Process B Statement of Support

[Holly Raiche <h.raiche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

HI Steve

I think this is a reasonable summary of where the team got to.  My  
one comment - sheer pedantry - is in the second paragraph.  Either  
there is consensus - which implies general but not necessarily total  
agreement - or you have unanimous agreement - which is everyone.  You  
can't have unanimous consensus.  so please just drop the word consensus
Thanks

Holly
On 21/05/2010, at 4:35 AM, Metalitz, Steven wrote:

> Thanks for these edits, Statton. The attached accepts virtually all  
> of them.  The exceptions are when you have either edited the text  
> of Proposed Process A, or retorted directly to the supporting  
> statement (e.g., in the reference to "active" participation).   
> Obviously the supporters of Process A could do the same and  
> critique what is in your supporting statement, but rather than play  
> tit for tat I suggest that the supporting statements respond to the  
> Proposed Process lists only.  (For the same reason, I think your  
> footnote is not appropriate with regard to "active" participation,  
> but I leave it up to you and your colleagues whether or not to  
> retain it.)
> I have also made the changes I suggested a few minutes ago to the  
> sentence concerning the position of Avri and others.   I also  
> changed the last sentence of the 2d paragraph because both proposed  
> processes call for public comment.
> I believe we are just about done in terms of our editing work and  
> look forward to receiving the staff's final version no later than  
> Monday. Of course if I am mistaken in my belief I am sure someone  
> will correct me!
> Steve
>
>
>
> From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa- 
> b@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hammock, Statton
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 5:58 PM
> To: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-raa-b] Comments on Section V and Process B Statement  
> of Support
> Steve,
>
>
>
> Attached is a redline showing recommended changes to your initial  
> draft of Section V of the RAA Initial Draft Report (which also  
> incorporates Avri’s edit from today).
>
>
> This version also includes a draft Statement of Support for  
> Proposed Process B.   Also, I’d like to follow-up Tim’s request  
> from yesterday to add SubTeam B’s attendance record to Annex C.
>
>
> Questions or comments from the SubTeam are welcome but please also  
> be sure to copy Tim and Michele as I will be out of the office on  
> Thursday and Friday and may be unable to respond to comments as  
> quickly as I would like.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Statton
>
>
>
>  Statton Hammock
>  Sr. Director, Law, Policy & Business Affairs
>
> <image001.gif>
>
> P 703-668-5515  M 703-624-5031 www.networksolutions.com
>
>
>
>
>
> <image001.gif><RAA Report Draft - Section V_ SH changes mostly  
> accepted (RAA Report Draft - Section V_ Clean with SH changes).DOC>
Kind regards

Holly Raiche
Executive Director,
Internet Society of Australia (ISOC-AU)
ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mob: 0412 688 544
Ph: (02) 9436 2149

The Internet is For Everyone