Re: [gnso-raa-b] RAA processes

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

On 21 May 2010, at 18:38, Mason Cole wrote:

>  but ultimately with respect to the ICANN entity and its agreement with 
> registrars, it will be only the two contracted parties.

As I have explained, we are the contracted party ICANN.  

But in any case:

I expect the Registrar SG representatives will be informing the GNSO that its 
management decisions and the bottom up process are irrelevant because you have 
defined yourselves the ultimate decision makers in this process.

I think this would be an interesting case for the AOC accountability and 
transparency Review Team and I hope they take the case up in detail.

Thank you for the most interesting ultimatum.

a.