<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-rap-dt] For review - draft motion
- To: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>, "gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-rap-dt] For review - draft motion
- From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:01:29 -0800
Kristina, I copied this section from the Fast Flux Working Group Charter. I
assumed that these served as the current guidelines for Working Groups, but I
might be wrong here as these were adopted by the Council before I joined ICANN.
How was this handled in the past? I am more than happy to leave it out and have
the GNSO Council discuss which processes should apply to the Working Group.
Best regards,
Marika
On 2/9/09 6:54 PM, "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Where did the Working Group Processes section come from? I've never seen that
text before and don't recall our discussing it. (If I'm wrong on the latter
point, please let me know.) With the exception of that section, I'm fine with
the motion. I have no objection to changing the time window to 90 days as Beau
suggested. I have no objection to Greg's suggested amendment.
As for the Working Group Processes section, I would prefer that it be deleted.
If these are the processes to apply, the decision should be made by the Council
and should apply to all WGs - not just this one. This is beyond our remit. As
for the substance itself, I believe the more appropriate terminology for the
minority report should be minority statement. The persons with the minority
view aren't going to be submitting their own report, right? In that case, a
"statement" is more accurate.
I have no availability for a call before the 12th. (I'm in SF for the INTA
Internet Forum and won't be back in DC until Thursday.)
K
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 2:18 PM
To: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-rap-dt] For review - draft motion
Dear All,
As mentioned in my previous e-mail, please find attached a draft motion for
review. Please note that the motion will need to be provided to the Council at
the latest by Thursday 12 February in order to be considered at the next GNSO
Council meeting on 19 February. Please share your comments and edits with the
list.
Best regards,
Marika
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|