<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-rap-dt] for discussion: the definition of "abuse"
- To: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-rap-dt] for discussion: the definition of "abuse"
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:11:33 -0500
great job Greg,
after reading your comments about predicate,
prerequisite and enabler i'm being drawn back to
"predicate." looking up "enabler" i find that a
lot of the definitions spring from the
co-dependency world and aren't anywhere near what
we are describing. it doesn't even show up in
the spell checker i'm using to write this
email. i buy your argument about
"prerequisite." so i'm liking "predicate" better
and better. using "predicate" would also have us
building on the WHOIS taskforce definition.
i also like the addition of the "and" at the end
of the first numbered clause.
in sum. i like it as you've set it forth, and
would be inclined to stick with "predicate."
m
At 01:04 PM 4/13/2009, you wrote:
Dear team:
Here is the definition we worked on in today?s
meeting. Please discuss on the list.
* * * *
Abuse is an action that:
1. causes actual and substantial harm, or is a
[TDB: predicate or enabler or prerequisite] of such harm, and
2. is illegal or illegitimate, or is otherwise
considered contrary to the intention and design
of a stated legitimate purpose, if such purpose is disclosed.
Notes:
* The party or parties harmed, and the substance
or severity of the abuse, should be identified
and discussed in relation to a specific proposed abuse.
* The term "harm" is not intended to shield a
party from fair market competition.
* The above definition of abuse is indebted to
the definition of "misuse" in the document
"Working Definitions for Key Terms that May be
Used in Future WHOIS Studies" prepared by the
GNSO Drafting Team [18 February 2009, at
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/whois-working-definitions-study-terms-18feb09.pdf].
* * * *
We were wrestling with the meaning of the term
?predicate.? Webster?s defines predicate as ?a
term designating a property or
relation.? Here?s the example for WHOIS from the GNSO Drafting Team document:
?Misuse is an action that causes actual harm, is
the predicate to such harm, is illegal or
illegitimate, or is otherwise considered
contrary to intention and design of a stated
legitimate purpose, if such purpose is
disclosed. When applied to Whois data, such
harmful actions may include the generation of
spam, the abuse of personal data, intellectual
property theft, loss of reputation or identity
theft, loss of data, phishing and other
cybercrime related exploits, harassment,
stalking, or other activity with negative
personal or economic consequences. The predicate
to harmful action often includes automated email
harvesting, domain name registration by
proxy/privacy services to aid wrongful activity,
and support of false or misleading registrant
data. Predicate acts might include the use of
Whois data to develop large email lists for commercial purposes.?
So there, ?predicate? indicated related
practices, or activities that support the abuse.
A prerequisite is something "required
beforehand". (A visa is a prerequisite for
travel in many countries.) I don?t think
?prerequisite? is a good word. For example,
WHOIS mining is not a required activity for
spamming ? one can get e-mail addresses in many
different ways. Rather, WHOIS mining is an
activity that is a predicate of spamming, or
enables spamming, or is used to support spamming.
All best,
--Greg
**********************************
Greg Aaron
Director, Key Account Management and Domain Security
Afilias
vox: +1.215.706.5700 x104
fax: 1.215.706.5701
gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx
**********************************
The information contained in this message may be
privileged and confidential and protected from
disclosure. If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the
message and deleting it from your computer.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|