RE: [gnso-rap-dt] revised WHOIS note

["Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Paul: 
Was not a vote on a charter change -- the note was to tell the Council that
we're interpreting the charter and wanted to let them know about that. 
--Greg
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Stahura [mailto:Paul.Stahura@xxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 4:34 PM
To: gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Beau Brendler'; 'Roland Perry'
Cc: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-rap-dt] revised WHOIS note

I did not know below was GNSO vote on charter, and I don't think I'm
eligible to vote, if so, please disregard message below.
I'll try to make the next call, but have conflict for that weekly meeting
time.

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Aaron [mailto:gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:31 PM
To: Paul Stahura; 'Beau Brendler'; 'Roland Perry'
Cc: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-rap-dt] revised WHOIS note

Dear Paul, Beau, Roland:

Look forward to your participation on the next conference call: August 3,
14:00 UTC.

All best,
--Greg



-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Stahura [mailto:Paul.Stahura@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:52 PM
To: Beau Brendler; Roland Perry
Cc: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-rap-dt] revised WHOIS note


I vote for dismissing WHOIS - didn't know there was a voting going on till I
saw message below.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Beau Brendler
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 12:49 PM
To: Roland Perry
Cc: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-rap-dt] revised WHOIS note


Agree with Roland, would vote against dismissing WHOIS outright, sorry
to have missed vote
Beau Brendler

Sent from my iPhone

On 23/07/2009, at 3:35 PM, Roland Perry
<roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> In message <EF540DBF36AD494ABA9956846D1C0968@xxxxxxxxxxx>, at
> 15:00:20 on Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Greg Aaron <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
>> So, I need to know if anyone would like to switch their vote.  If
>> so please
>> indicate explicitly on the list by 22:00 UTC tomorrow so that the
>> tally can
>> be accurately recorded in the note to Council.  Rod, Mike, and
>> Roland, can
>> you confirm your positions -- do you agree with a and b as per
>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-rap-dt/msg00255.html ?  If not,
>> please
>> describe.
>
> There's only a short time to go (could we have longer than this in
> future, we could easily be travelling), and I wasn't on the call.
>
> I can't agree to dismiss WHOIS problems because a registration that
> has demonstrably false WHOIS (eg "Mickey Mouse, Disneyland") must be
> indicative of some kind of abuse. It's also the case that some tlds
> have geographic qualifications (eg "Resident in country X") and a
> WHOIS indicating a different country would have to raise questions.
> --
> Roland Perry