RE: [gnso-rapimpl-dt] Fwd: [gnso-rap-dt] Homework assignment -- due Friday -- Matrix

["Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mikey:
I forgot to mark one that had more than 50% support in the RAPWG.
"Uniformity of Contracts" is very low on my list.  If I had to rank
everything, I'd say "Uniformity of Contracts" is a 14.
All best,
--Greg


-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Aaron [mailto:gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 3:07 PM
To: 'gnso-rapimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx'
Subject: FW: [gnso-rapimpl-dt] Fwd: [gnso-rap-dt] Homework assignment -- due
Friday -- Matrix

Here's my filled-in version.

A number of the rows are N/A in my opinion -- those cases where the RAPWG
did not recommend that any action be taken.  So I really only thought there
were about 7 recommendations that I would/could/should rank.  I have noted
those in the "Sequence" column.

All best,
--Greg



-----Original Message-----
From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 7:59 AM
To: gnso-rapimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-rapimpl-dt] Fwd: [gnso-rap-dt] Homework assignment -- due
Friday -- Matrix


hi all,

argh!!  i sent this note to the wrong list.  sorry about the duplicates for
those of you on both, and sorry about the delay for those of you who aren't.

here's the latest version of the matrix and the one that you should use to
evaluate the sequence of the RAP initiatives.

please complete it by noon Friday (US Eastern time -- 1600 UTC).  i'll fold
together a summary over the weekend and get it to the list before our call
next Monday.

if you couldn't make the call, check out the MP3 for an explanation of what
this is all about -- and a fabulous rendition of "happy birthday" in honor
of Margie's birthday today.

mikey