ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-rapimpl-dt] call for agenda items

  • To: "Rosaya, Lisa W." <Lisa.Rosaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Greg Aaron <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-rapimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-rapimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-rapimpl-dt] call for agenda items
  • From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 06:54:50 -0700

Dear All,

Please find attached the latest version that Greg was referring to in his
email (it was only sent to the chairs). It aims to address the comments
made by Chuck and others. With regards to Chuck's comment that it might be
helpful to include an abbreviation in the recommendation column so Council
members do not have to go back between Annex I and II/III, this might
prove challenging as it is difficult to capture the detail of each
recommendation in abbreviated form. Another approach could be to add a
priority sequence column to Annex I so it is clear to see how the
recommendations are rated. What do the members of the DT think? Also,
there is two comments from Chuck relating to the recommendation on Meta
Issue: Collection and Dissemination of Best Practices and the WHOIS Access
Recommendation #1 that might require further discussion by the DT.

With best regards,


On 05/11/10 14:49, "Rosaya, Lisa W." <Lisa.Rosaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Dear Greg,
>I don't appear to have received the version Marika sent around today.
>Could you please send that to me?
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-gnso-rapimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-gnso-rapimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg Aaron
>Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:23 AM
>To: 'Mike O'Connor'; gnso-rapimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [gnso-rapimpl-dt] call for agenda items
>Yes.  The version that Marika sent around today is the latest and
>version, so we should review that one on Monday.
>Have a good weekend,
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 8:54 AM
>To: gnso-rapimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [gnso-rapimpl-dt] call for agenda items
>hi all,
>our focus on Monday will be to take a detailed look at the report draft
>(hopefully) wrap up our work.
>anything else we need to cover?
>- - - - - - - - -
>phone     651-647-6109
>fax          866-280-2356
>web     http://www.haven2.com
>handle    OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
>Pursuant to requirements related to practice before the Internal Revenue
>Service, any tax advice contained in this communication (including any
>attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the
>purposes of (i) avoiding penalties imposed under the United States
>Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
>another person any tax-related matter.
>This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If it
>has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of the
>error and then immediately delete this message.  Please visit
>www.bakermckenzie.com/disclaimers  for other important information
>concerning this message.

Attachment: RAP IDT Letter to the GNSO Council - Updated 5 November version 3.doc
Description: RAP IDT Letter to the GNSO Council - Updated 5 November version 3.doc

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy