RE: [gnso-rapimpl-dt] For review - updated letter to the GNSO Council

["Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello; two items:

 

1.       Under the Malicious Use entry, the notes say "Preference for PDP
approach even if desired outcome is not policy but best practices."  The
"if" is confusing, since it accidentally implies that policy is a possible
outcome.   I suggest: "Preference to use PDP process; outcome to be best
practices."

 

2.       Cybersquatting: the notes section says "There may be a dependency
with WHOIS studies."  I can't remember what that dependency was.  Can anyone
refresh my memory?

 

All best,

--Greg

 

 

 

From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 2:00 PM
To: gnso-rapimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-rapimpl-dt] For review - updated letter to the GNSO Council

 

Dear All,

 

Following today's meeting, please find attached the latest version of the
proposed letter to the GNSO Council which incorporates the edits discussed
on the call.You'll find attached a clean as well as a redline version.
Please review the letter carefully. You are requested to share any comments,
edits, suggestions on the mailing list prior to next week's call. The
objective of the next meeting is to finalize the letter and submit it to the
GNSO Council immediately following the call to meet the 15 November
publication deadline for Cartagena.

 

Thanks,

 

Marika