ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-res-sga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-res-sga] general criteria

  • To: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>, gnso-res-sga@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-res-sga] general criteria
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 06:38:55 -0700 (PDT)

Thank you for your prompt response and clarification.
   
  Eric

"Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx> wrote:
      Hugh, 
   
  For your ready reference I paste below the relevant excerpt from the post 
that I believe Maria referred to. 
   
  I take your suggestion below as responsive to the WHEN question.  I believe 
there will be at least one posting today providing an alternative approach for 
discussion tomorrow. I encourage others to submit their views today on one or 
more of the questions.  
   
  Steve Metalitz
   
  In light of our assignment, it may be useful to organize
proposals regarding the OPOC's "roles, responsibilities and
requirements" by addressing the following questions.  Of course a
particular proposal might take up only one of these questions,  all of
them, or something in between.  
A.      WHO is the OPOC:  qualifications, identification to/
verification by registrar, need for consent before listing, etc.  
B.      WHAT issues is the OPOC required to handle - or not  
C.      WHEN must the OPOC act - time frames for response, etc.  
D.      HOW would these responsibilities be enforced - what happens if
they are not fulfilled 

   

    
---------------------------------
  From: owner-gnso-res-sga@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-res-sga@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Hugh Dierker
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 9:50 AM
To: gnso-res-sga@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-res-sga] general criteria


  
   
  I am half blind at the moment but out of the very few post to this sub group 
I find no statement from our chair which would organize us to moving forward in 
a cohesive fashion. 
   
  Maria Farrell laid it out pretty well and referenced a post by Mr. Metalist 
which is not on the list.
   
  I think the OPoC should be given 10 days and then the name suspended. Of 
course the original query must be a valid one. The OPoC settles many privacy 
issues, but I wonder the cost for the home based non-commercial user.
   
  Eric 
    
---------------------------------
  Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos. 

       
---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
 Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy