Re: [gnso-res-sga] Whois working group scope

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

I pretty much have to agree here. 
  I do not think it needs to be to prohibitive but something of a borderline 
would be helpful.
  Maybe we do not discuss it; but we just get told what the scope is and we 
live with it.
   
  Eric

Robin Gross <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  This approach seems a backwards to me. How can we do the work if we 
don't know what is within the scope of our work? Considering the 
confusion as to the scope of this work, I'd like to have some further 
clarification to Avri's question. It is at the heart of what we are 
doing here.

Thank you,
Robin


Philip Sheppard wrote:

>Avri,
>lets not debate scope.
>Lets do the work and then decide if our conclusions have any implementation 
>relevance.
>Philip
>
> 
>



       
---------------------------------
Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! 
FareChase.