Re: [gnso-res-sga] Another issue for subgroup A from subgroupB list
Hi all, This brief exchange just exposes IMHO the typical trap the "all or nothing" approach is constantly putting us in while discussing Whois policies. As if digital tools did not allow us to find smart applications between "everything hidden" and "everything visible". I see no reason why whois records for individuals (and therefore protected from public visibility) when displayed by the registrar for instance could not have a "send an email" button allowing anybody to contact the domain name holder on a direct private basis without knowing their address. This solves the problem Steve raises and does not go in the direction of the "give me your phone number" Milton fears. This is absolutely commonplace in myriads of social networking sites and more ancient applications. Are there any objections to such an idea or is it so obvious that we don't think of it any more ? Why don't we also try to allow services that are simple and useful and respect privacy ? As I mentioned in the conference calls, the wole discussion about the Opoc approach is so much oriented towards reining in the development of proxy services that we seem not to care about the individual registrant any more and just about the big market forces. Just my personal opinion. Best Bertrand On 5/21/07, Milton Mueller <Mueller@xxxxxxx> wrote:
-- ____________________ Bertrand de La Chapelle Délégué Spécial pour la Société de l'Information / Special Envoy for the Information Society Ministère des Affaires Etrangères / French Ministry of Foreign Affairs Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32 "Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint Exupéry ("there is no better mission for humans than uniting humans")
|