RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] RE: Draft Revisions Bylaws - GNSO Restructure
I took up Avri's suggestion and prepared a red-line version of Philip's document that will hopefully facilitate our discussion on the Bylaws changes needed for Council restructure. Thanks Philip for all the time you put into this. Chuck > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 11:23 AM > To: Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] RE: Draft Revisions Bylaws - GNSO > Restructure > > > (i have moved this discussion to the restructuring list, as > that includes all council members as well as those others > from the constituencies who are acting as subs or additions from the > constituencies) > > > > Hi, > > I tend to think we should just talk through each of the > proposed changes in order finding out which ones have > consensus, and then precede to further discuss the ones, > assuming there are some, that do not have consensus. > > It might be good for other proposed stakeholder groups to > also redline the proposed by-laws, perhaps starting from > Philip's changes, so that we have a complete set of proposed changes. > > As soon as we get a meeting scheduled for the restructuring > phone call, we should put this as the first item on the agenda. > > a. > > > On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 11:03 -0400, Gomes, Chuck wrote: > > Thanks for the quick response. In my opinion, I think it would be > > helpful to clearly identify any deviances from the Board approved > > recommendations and that we should handle those separately from the > > rest of the text. > > > > Chuck > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 10:51 AM > > > To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: RE: [council] Draft Revisions Bylaws - GNSO Restructure > > > > > > > > > > > > One is certainly - as the Board recommendations were > predicated on > > > events that have not come to pass. > > > > > > > > > > > the messages refered to and the edit can be foiund in: > http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg06676.html > > > > > Attachment:
GNSO Council Restructure-Bylaws Changes - CSG edits v2 - Gomes comments.doc
|