<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-restruc-dt] Meeting invitation
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, <Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-restruc-dt] Meeting invitation
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 12:25:07 +0200
I have no problem at all with inviting Raimondo to our meeting.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 30/04/09 23:53, « Avri Doria » <avri@xxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> It turns out that the Board's Structural Improvement Committee (SIC),
> has chosen Raimundo as its liaison to the GNSO Improvement Team.
> Now the meeting on tuesday is not properly speaking a GNSO Improvement
> Team Meeting, but as there are issues of interpretation of board
> intentions, I was wondering whether there would be any objection to my
> inviting Raimundo to the meeting.
>
> Another process idea might be to just create a set of questions that
> could be passed on to him and to others in the SIC, but given that the
> interpretation issue has pushed back completion of the exercise for a
> month or more, I was thinking it might be an idea to try and eliminate
> the extra step. And if either people object to inviting him or he
> cannot make it, that may be what we have to do in any case.
>
> BTW: I may be being naively optimistic, but I would like to be able to
> bring the proposed amendments to the By-laws to a council vote in
> Sydney.
>
> Thanks
> a.
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|