Re: [gnso-restruc-dt] Meeting invitation

[William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sure why not

Bill

On May 1, 2009, at 1:14 AM, Olga Cavalli wrote:

> I agree with inviting Raimundo.
> Olga
>
> 2009/4/30 Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
>
> Hi,
>
> It turns out that the Board's Structural Improvement Committee  
> (SIC), has chosen Raimundo as its liaison to the GNSO Improvement  
> Team.    Now the meeting on tuesday is not properly speaking a GNSO  
> Improvement Team Meeting, but as there are issues of interpretation  
> of board intentions, I was wondering whether there would be any  
> objection to my inviting Raimundo to the meeting.
> Another process idea might be to just create a set of questions that  
> could be passed on to him and to others in the SIC, but given that  
> the interpretation issue has pushed back completion of the exercise  
> for a month or more, I was thinking it might be an idea to try and  
> eliminate the extra step.  And if either people object to inviting  
> him or he cannot make it, that may be what we have to do in any case.
> BTW: I may be being naively optimistic, but I would like to be able  
> to bring the proposed amendments to the By-laws to a council vote in  
> Sydney.
> Thanks
> a.
***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
  Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
***********************************************************