<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Meeting invitation
- To: "gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Meeting invitation
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 07:36:13 -0400
I agree with Avri
If Raimundo is on the call why not engage him fully in the discussion?
> -----Original Message-----
> >
> > We may waste time on the live call otherwise.
>
> I agree that putting together a list of questions would be a good thing,
> and I will present that as a possibility to Raimundo.
>
> There are several concerns I have about doing only that:
>
> - are we sure we can agree on the wording of the questions. some of the
> items were there is a difference of interpretation on the Board's
> instructions may require a lot of work to document the differences.
> Participation in a meeting might shortcut some of the time it would take
> to come up with an expression of the questions that everyone could agree
> with.
>
> - we are already running very late in this process due to some of the
> interpretation differences that exist between some members of the
> council and the policy staff. Going through the time it took to craft
> proper questions, send them on, and wait for answers, would slow things
> down even further.
>
> At this point doing anything that might further impede forward progress
> seems, to me, to be counter indicated.
>
> Since most of those who responded, responded favorably to my making the
> invitation I will. I will however give him a choice of receiving a set
> of questions instead.
>
> In the meantime, if anyone wants to take a first crack at crafting a set
> of questions, that might be a good thing.
>
> thanks
> a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|