<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q9. Section 3.6 a & b: 13 and 14 switch
- To: "Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q9. Section 3.6 a & b: 13 and 14 switch
- From: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:53:59 -0700
Dear All,
To assist your discussions on these questions, I thought it would be useful to
provide the current proposed language on the table related to these questions.
Best Regards,
Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Currently Proposed Revisions:
6. Each of the two GNSO Houses, as described in Section 3(8) of this Article
(link TBD), shall make a selection to fill one of two ICANN Board seats, as
outlined below, by written ballot or by action at a meeting; any such selection
must have affirmative votes comprising 60% of all the respective voting house
members:
a. the Contracted Party & Suppliers House shall select Seat 13; and
b. the Users & Providers House shall select Seat 14 .
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 9:38 PM
To: Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q9. Section 3.6 a & b: 13 and 14 switch
Q9. Section 3.6 a & b: 13 and 14 switch
A proposal was made that seat 13 be assigned to the Non-Contracted
Parties House and that seat 14 be assigned to the Contracted Parties
house.
Should this change be made?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|