ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-restruc-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q9. Section 3.6 a & b: 13 and 14 switch

  • To: "Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q9. Section 3.6 a & b: 13 and 14 switch
  • From: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:53:59 -0700

Dear All,

To assist your discussions on these questions, I thought it would be useful to 
provide the current proposed language on the table related to these questions.

Best Regards,

Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Currently Proposed Revisions:

6. Each of the two GNSO Houses, as described in Section 3(8) of this Article 
(link TBD), shall make a selection to fill one of two ICANN Board seats, as 
outlined below, by written ballot or by action at a meeting; any such selection 
must have affirmative votes comprising 60% of all the respective voting house 
members:  

a.  the Contracted Party & Suppliers House shall select Seat 13; and
b. the Users & Providers House shall select Seat 14 .
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 9:38 PM
To: Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q9. Section 3.6 a & b: 13 and 14 switch


Q9. Section 3.6 a & b: 13 and 14 switch

A proposal was made that seat 13 be assigned to the Non-Contracted
Parties House and that seat 14 be assigned to the Contracted Parties
house.

Should this change be made?





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy