RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q16 on specific dates in by-laws transitional section

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I prefer not specifying a date and saying something like "a date to be
determined by the Board" but could live with a specific date if others
like that better.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 1:54 AM
> To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q16 on specific dates in by-laws 
> transitional section
> 
> 
> Article XX, Section 5, Transition Article, Items 3 & 4 (and 
> elsewhere in the document)
> 
> 
> Items 3 & 4 as well as elsewhere in the document, a specific 
> month is given for GNSO restructure implementation.  It was 
> previously June
> 2009 and it has been proposed to change it to October 2009.
> 
> 
> Q16 Should we include a specific date, including a day, for 
> when the implementation will occur?
> 
> *      Instead of including a date, should we refer to "a date to be  
> determined by the Board"?
> 
> *      Or should we include something like this: "No later then  
> (insert date TBD by Board)"?
> 
> 
> 
>