<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-restruc-dt] Q16 on specific dates in by-laws transitional section
- To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q16 on specific dates in by-laws transitional section
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 07:54:00 +0200
Article XX, Section 5, Transition Article, Items 3 & 4 (and elsewhere
in the document)
Items 3 & 4 as well as elsewhere in the document, a specific month is
given for GNSO restructure implementation. It was previously June
2009 and it has been proposed to change it to October 2009.
Q16 Should we include a specific date, including a day, for when the
implementation will occur?
· Instead of including a date, should we refer to “a date to be
determined by the Board”?
· Or should we include something like this: “No later then
(insert date TBD by Board)”?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|