<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q18 on thresholds - chairs and vice chairs
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q18 on thresholds - chairs and vice chairs
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:53:44 -0400
I need to think more about this. Leadership continuity is important for
more than 3 months.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 9:28 AM
> To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q18 on thresholds - chairs and
> vice chairs
>
>
>
> On 15 May 2009, at 15:22, Tim Ruiz wrote:
>
> >
> > If everyone agrees that there should be a default, then I
> would prefer
> > that the default be that the Vice Chairs serve as Co-Chairs
> for that
> > term.
>
> how about, maybe instead of for the whole year, doing it for
> 3 months that way (untel after the next face to face) and
> then trying an election again.
>
> a.
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|