[gnso-restruc-dt] Feedback from SIC

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I received email from Raimundo containing the following:

> Just in case that Roberto didn't had the time to explain it to you,  
> let me
> confirm that the idea regarding the seats 13 and 14 is that if the  
> Council
> doesn't agree in a wording tomorrow, then the SIC and the Board will  
> do it,
> after the Public Comments. Consistently, the appointment by the  
> Board of
> three Councillors at the NCSG will be added also by the Boar as a  
> transition
> article.

I have responded on the first point concerning the elections, that I  
did not expect
the council to be making a decision on that, but rather that the  
council was still
waiting on the Board to decide whether it had accepted the idea of the  
election
of those seats by the Houses and whether the order previous recommended
could be changed.

I also let him know that we had delayed our meeting by a week and  
thanked
him for the response related to the NCSG.

On the issue issue of the NCSG, their response means that in article XX,
Section 5.1.4 can now be completed and the comment removed.

d. The three seats currently assigned to the Non-Commercial Users  
Constituency
shall be reassigned as three of the seats of the Non-Commercial  
Stakeholder Group;
and 3 seats designated by the ICANN Board of Directors.

Given the SIC's position on the Board seat elections, and given that  
this is as far
as the Draft team of the Whole was able to get with the sense of the  
meeting of
people doing the final walk through in Sydney, I believe this is the  
last change
we should make before the staff publishes the draft for community  
comment.
Any other changes then can be made by council members offering a  
specific
textual amendment that can be voted in in the 9 Feb meeting before we  
vote
on the entire bylaw set.  I.e. as the draft team will not be meeting  
before that council
meeting, no more 'friendly amendments' can be adopted.

thanks

a.