[gnso-restruc-dt] Feedback from SIC
- To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Feedback from SIC
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 07:11:24 +0200
I received email from Raimundo containing the following:
Just in case that Roberto didn't had the time to explain it to you,
confirm that the idea regarding the seats 13 and 14 is that if the
doesn't agree in a wording tomorrow, then the SIC and the Board will
after the Public Comments. Consistently, the appointment by the
three Councillors at the NCSG will be added also by the Boar as a
I have responded on the first point concerning the elections, that I
did not expect
the council to be making a decision on that, but rather that the
council was still
waiting on the Board to decide whether it had accepted the idea of the
of those seats by the Houses and whether the order previous recommended
could be changed.
I also let him know that we had delayed our meeting by a week and
him for the response related to the NCSG.
On the issue issue of the NCSG, their response means that in article XX,
Section 5.1.4 can now be completed and the comment removed.
d. The three seats currently assigned to the Non-Commercial Users
shall be reassigned as three of the seats of the Non-Commercial
and 3 seats designated by the ICANN Board of Directors.
Given the SIC's position on the Board seat elections, and given that
this is as far
as the Draft team of the Whole was able to get with the sense of the
people doing the final walk through in Sydney, I believe this is the
we should make before the staff publishes the draft for community
Any other changes then can be made by council members offering a
textual amendment that can be voted in in the 9 Feb meeting before we
on the entire bylaw set. I.e. as the draft team will not be meeting
before that council
meeting, no more 'friendly amendments' can be adopted.