<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-review-dt] Additional input on 360 Assessment Questions
- To: "'Avri Doria'" <avri@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-review-dt] Additional input on 360 Assessment Questions
- From: "Ron Andruff" <ra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:03:13 -0400
Hi Avri,
Just for clarification, regarding the NCA and your comment about how they are
apportioned, do you mean whether they should be voting/non-voting or do you
think there should be more or less of them?
Thanks,
RA
Ron Andruff
dotSport LLC
www.lifedotsport.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 11:50
To: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] Additional input on 360 Assessment Questions
Hi,
While the questions leave me unimpressed, they are ok.
What is missing in my opinion is a column for the GNSO Houses
Also is there any way the review could take into account the situation with
NCAs? Do we think that they way they are being apportioned in the best.
Perhaps a column referring to them as well could be useful.
avri
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|