<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Only 7 of 20 members of this Working Party have completed the 360 survey
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Only 7 of 20 members of this Working Party have completed the 360 survey
- From: Colin Jackson <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:48:51 +1200
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html
charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode:
space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">Chuck<div><br></div><div>To
answer your question:<br><div><br></div><div><blockquote type="cite"><div
lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class="WordSection1"
style="page: WordSection1;"><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size:
11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="color: rgb(31, 73,
125);">Do the purple bars in the first chart represent the total completed as
of 16 September or just those completed since last
tabulated?<o:p></o:p></span></div><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt;
font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="color: rgb(31,
73, 125);"> </span></div><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size:
11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="color: rgb(31, 73,
125);">It is hard to tell without seeing the numbers, but looking at the CSG
bars and comparing them to the three constituencies that make up the CSG, the
chart does not look correct. If the bars for the BC, IPC and ISPs are
added, it appears that the bars for the CSG should be much higher. Am I
misinterpreting something
here?</span></div></div></div></blockquote><br><div><img name="unknown.png"
apple-inline="yes" id="116FF926-F863-4589-97B9-F98AAD7073DA" height="454"
width="640" apple-width="yes" apple-height="yes"
src="cid:9C66D6DA-9427-4EAC-8046-25B56FB1345A"></div><div>The bars represent
the total completed questionnaires in each category as at the date in question,
which is 16 Sep for the purple ones. The underlying spreadsheet looks like
this:</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><img apple-inline="yes"
id="451BF8E5-0B00-4AB4-9775-407170F87877" height="86" width="843"
apple-width="yes" apple-height="yes"
src="cid:4BAE648D-CCA7-45A7-AF28-9C7DB8BC606C"></div><div><br></div><div>I
count a questionnaire as completed if the respondent has got as far as Qs11-13,
which is the last page of general questions that are mandatory to answer. I
count it under the GNSO Council if the respondent had answered the questions on
that page (mostly mandatory if you enter the page at all). I treat the
constituencies and stakeholder groups in the same way. Please note constituency
numbers are not consolidated into the stakeholder groups; numbers for each SG
represent people who were asked to answer questions about the SG specifically,
knowing that they would have a separate opportunity to comment on
constituencies.</div><div><br></div><div>I hope this
clarifies!</div><div><br></div><div>Kind
regards</div><div><br></div><div>Colin</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><br><div
apple-content-edited="true">
<div><br>Colin Jackson<br><br><a
href="mailto:colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</a><br>+64
21 393 685<br><a href="skype:colinjackson">skype:colinjackson</a></div>
</div>
<br><div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></body></html> 
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|