RE: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Only 7 of 20 members of this Working Party have completed the 360 survey

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Colin.  I think that explains why the CSG does not equal to the sum CBUC 
+ IPC + ISP.  In the future it would be helpful if we asked respondents to 
identify what SGs and constituencies they were members of so we do not have 
estimate that from their answers.  Maybe we could do that on the WG survey.

Chuck

From: Colin Jackson [mailto:colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 4:49 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Only 7 of 20 members of this Working Party 
have completed the 360 survey

Chuck

To answer your question:

Do the purple bars in the first chart represent the total completed as of 16 
September or just those completed since last tabulated?

It is hard to tell without seeing the numbers, but looking at the CSG bars and 
comparing them to the three constituencies that make up the CSG, the chart does 
not look correct.  If the bars for the BC, IPC and ISPs are added, it appears 
that the bars for the CSG should be much higher.  Am I misinterpreting 
something here?

[cid:image001.png@01CFD298.5A6C1B50]
The bars represent the total completed questionnaires in each category as at 
the date in question, which is 16 Sep for the purple ones. The underlying 
spreadsheet looks like this:


[cid:image003.jpg@01CFD298.5A6C1B50]

I count a questionnaire as completed if the respondent has got as far as 
Qs11-13, which is the last page of general questions that are mandatory to 
answer. I count it under the GNSO Council if the respondent had answered the 
questions on that page (mostly mandatory if you enter the page at all). I treat 
the constituencies and stakeholder groups in the same way. Please note 
constituency numbers are not consolidated into the stakeholder groups; numbers 
for each SG represent people who were asked to answer questions about the SG 
specifically, knowing that they would have a separate opportunity to comment on 
constituencies.

I hope this clarifies!

Kind regards

Colin




Colin Jackson

colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+64 21 393 685
skype:colinjackson