Re: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Only 7 of 20 members of this Working Party have completed the 360 survey

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

If we do ask about membership, then we should also ask what groups they
were observers of.  I answered for my own groups as well as those I
observe a lot.

BTW, does everyone have to give a name, i don't remember.  Re the 7/20
figure, is it possible some of us responded but did not give names for
further contacts?  I gave a name, and do not remember a question asking
if I was in this review group, so can't be sure how the 7/20 figure was
determined.  just curious.

avri



On 17-Sep-14 16:56, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Thanks Colin.  I think that explains why the CSG does not equal to the sum 
> CBUC + IPC + ISP.  In the future it would be helpful if we asked respondents 
> to identify what SGs and constituencies they were members of so we do not 
> have estimate that from their answers.  Maybe we could do that on the WG 
> survey.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> From: Colin Jackson [mailto:colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 4:49 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Only 7 of 20 members of this Working Party 
> have completed the 360 survey
> 
> Chuck
> 
> To answer your question:
> 
> Do the purple bars in the first chart represent the total completed as of 16 
> September or just those completed since last tabulated?
> 
> It is hard to tell without seeing the numbers, but looking at the CSG bars 
> and comparing them to the three constituencies that make up the CSG, the 
> chart does not look correct.  If the bars for the BC, IPC and ISPs are added, 
> it appears that the bars for the CSG should be much higher.  Am I 
> misinterpreting something here?
> 
> [cid:image001.png@01CFD298.5A6C1B50]
> The bars represent the total completed questionnaires in each category as at 
> the date in question, which is 16 Sep for the purple ones. The underlying 
> spreadsheet looks like this:
> 
> 
> [cid:image003.jpg@01CFD298.5A6C1B50]
> 
> I count a questionnaire as completed if the respondent has got as far as 
> Qs11-13, which is the last page of general questions that are mandatory to 
> answer. I count it under the GNSO Council if the respondent had answered the 
> questions on that page (mostly mandatory if you enter the page at all). I 
> treat the constituencies and stakeholder groups in the same way. Please note 
> constituency numbers are not consolidated into the stakeholder groups; 
> numbers for each SG represent people who were asked to answer questions about 
> the SG specifically, knowing that they would have a separate opportunity to 
> comment on constituencies.
> 
> I hope this clarifies!
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Colin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Colin Jackson
> 
> colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +64 21 393 685
> skype:colinjackson
> 
> 
>