ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-review-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Schedule Update

  • To: "gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Schedule Update
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 13:44:12 -0500

Hi,

Too bad about the meeting cancellation*.  I was hoping to bring up a
letter request to the board that is coming the NCPH meeting held this
week, for a review of a structure we almost all fond unsatisfactory in
one way or another (though we did not necessarily agree on the ways in
which it was was messed up).  I will find the final draft of the letter
and forward it to this list (unless Tony who has the final version is on
this list and can send it directly)

Also there was real concern mentioned in this NCPH meeting about the
GNSO not doing its own self review.  I know we talked about it at some
some point, but do not not remember where we left it.

Another thing that was mentioned to me that we might want to explore. 
An unnamed member of the staff did wonder why we wait around on the
review and on the SIC for revisions to the GNSO structure &c.  Why, if
we do our own review and figure out the changes we want to make, doesn't
the GNSO just tell the the SIC what we want.

I had to answer that I did not know why we show so little initiative,
and started to feel that maybe the GNSO is like one of those elephants
that are chained at birth when they can't break the chain and remain
chained as adults even though they could easily break the chains.

Cheers,

avri

* I know, somewhat cheeky to complain when i have missed so many.


On 16-Jan-15 09:55, Jen Wolfe wrote:
>
> Hi Philip,
>
>  
>
> My sincerest apologies for any confusion.  There was a note that went
> out to cancel these meetings and we are working on distributing a
> revised schedule.  The report has not yet been circulated.  I believe
> the revised date will be later in January with our first meeting to
> take place in person in Singapore.  We should have that updated
> schedule out soon and again apologize for any confusion or
> miscommunication.
>
>  
>
> I look forward to seeing you in Singapore. 
>
>  
>
> Have a great weekend!
>
>  
>
> Jen
>
>  
>
> *jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB*
>
> Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm
>
> */513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348/*
>
> */IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014/*
>
> What will you do with your Dot Brand?  : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P
>
> Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs  http://ow.ly/Eblgc 
>
> Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column  http://ow.ly/EbljP 
>
> Linked In Group:  gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM
>
>  
>
> *From:*owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *BRG
> *Sent:* Friday, January 16, 2015 8:10 AM
> *To:* 'Larisa B. Gurnick'; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> *Cc:* 'Glen de Saint Géry'
> *Subject:* RE: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Schedule Update
>
>  
>
> Larisa, Jen,
>
> are we still on for the calls today Jan 16 and Jan 22 at 18 UTC or did
> your updated message of 2 Jan say these were postponed?
>
>  
>
> If the calls are on do we have a draft report to see?
>
>  
>
> Philip
>
>  
>
>  
>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy