[gnso-review-dt] RE: Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Larisa.

Chuck

From: Larisa B. Gurnick [mailto:larisa.gurnick@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 2:09 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Jen Wolfe; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx); Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: RE: Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline

Chuck,
Please feel free to share the extended timeline and related details - for your 
convenience, the information is posted<https://community.icann.org/x/OJLhAg> on 
the home page of the GNSO Review community wiki.  The detailed 
timeline<https://community.icann.org/x/VwEnAw> is also available in the wiki, 
where progress is tracked.

Best,
Larisa

From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:25 AM
To: Jen Wolfe; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; Jonathan Robinson 
(jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>); Glen de 
Saint Géry
Subject: RE: Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline

Thanks Jen and Larisa and Westlake.  This seems very responsive in my opinion 
to the concerns that were communicated on the Working Call that I just listened.

I have one question:  Is it okay if I share the timeline below with the RySG; 
questions were asked about the timeline on the RySG call yesterday.

Chuck

From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jen Wolfe
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:48 AM
To: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; Jonathan Robinson 
(jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>); Glen de 
Saint Géry (Glen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx>)
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline

Dear GNSO Review Working Party,

Thank you to everyone for your active participation in our call to provide 
initial feedback to the Westlake team last week.   You diligence in reviewing 
the report and providing feedback is greatly appreciated!

To address concerns regarding the timeline,  we have worked with Staff and 
Westlake to adjust the timeframe for next steps.  I have attached a Word 
document which details the adjusted time frame and also dropped in below a 
graphic showing the timeline modified to respond to community concerns.

Please continue to provide redlines, letters or responses through March 20th, 
so that Westlake can take this into consideration when revising their report.  
You can send this through the list or post on the wiki.  All comments will be 
provided to Westlake.

When delivering the next version of the report, we have asked Westlake to be 
clear in stating its rationale for any comments which they do not take 
incorporate into their report.  The next version will be provided as Draft 0 
and circulated on April 24th.  Please note dates for subsequent calls and 
meetings to respond to Draft 0 are included on the attached timeline and 
schedule.

I hope you will agree this is helpful in providing additional time to gather 
and provide feedback in a meaningful way.  I look forward to continuing to work 
with you and welcome your feedback.  I wish you all a Happy Spring and look 
forward to talking again in May!




[cid:image001.jpg@01D05CF1.C9D50900]



jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB
Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm
513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348
IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014
What will you do with your Dot Brand?  : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P
Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs  http://ow.ly/Eblgc
Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column  http://ow.ly/EbljP
Linked In Group:  gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM