[gnso-review-dt] RE: Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jen/Larisa,

What is intended with the SIC update in late April?

I would suggest sending out meeting requests as soon as possible for 4 May and 
12 May so that all of us can try to keep the times free if possible.  If we 
later need to change or delete them, we can deal with that at that time.

Considering the number of comments that were submitted on the working text, the 
large amount of new text that will be added as noted in the working text and 
the overall size of the document, I think a three week turn-around time for 
Working Party input on v.0 may be challenging but we can try. It will likely 
depend on what other time sensitive items all of us have at the time.  We can 
try but we should be prepared to extend if needed.

Regarding the public comment period in June, we should be thinking of ways that 
we can facilitate public comments.  Because of the size of the document, the 
significance it will have on various community interests and the fact that the 
period will likely coincide with critical efforts of the CWG IANA and CCWG 
Accountability, we going to need to make it as easy as possible to people to 
review and respond to recommendations in the report.

The GNSO Council Update at ICANN 53 is of course a must, but I think an update 
to the Council should be given before the public comment period as well so that 
the Council can do what it can to encourage comments.

Chuck

From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Jen Wolfe
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:48 AM
To: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx); Glen 
de Saint Géry (Glen@xxxxxxxxx)
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline

Dear GNSO Review Working Party,

Thank you to everyone for your active participation in our call to provide 
initial feedback to the Westlake team last week.   You diligence in reviewing 
the report and providing feedback is greatly appreciated!

To address concerns regarding the timeline,  we have worked with Staff and 
Westlake to adjust the timeframe for next steps.  I have attached a Word 
document which details the adjusted time frame and also dropped in below a 
graphic showing the timeline modified to respond to community concerns.

Please continue to provide redlines, letters or responses through March 20th, 
so that Westlake can take this into consideration when revising their report.  
You can send this through the list or post on the wiki.  All comments will be 
provided to Westlake.

When delivering the next version of the report, we have asked Westlake to be 
clear in stating its rationale for any comments which they do not take 
incorporate into their report.  The next version will be provided as Draft 0 
and circulated on April 24th.  Please note dates for subsequent calls and 
meetings to respond to Draft 0 are included on the attached timeline and 
schedule.

I hope you will agree this is helpful in providing additional time to gather 
and provide feedback in a meaningful way.  I look forward to continuing to work 
with you and welcome your feedback.  I wish you all a Happy Spring and look 
forward to talking again in May!




[cid:image001.jpg@01D05F1D.39E53F80]



jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB
Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm
513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348
IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014
What will you do with your Dot Brand?  : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P
Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs  http://ow.ly/Eblgc
Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column  http://ow.ly/EbljP
Linked In Group:  gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM