RE: [gnso-review-dt] [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party Draft Statement on Westlake Goverance’s Final GNSO Review Report

["Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello all,
Although I have not participated in the discussions, I am the alternate to 
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben, ISPCP representative, I have been following the discussion.
I think that the ISPCP cannot share this statement.  First, in our opinion 
Westlake work was very good and sugested a lot of improvements.  Second, 
regarding Recommendation 23 we are not totally against it, it has some merit, 
though we accept that it must be revised considering the particularities of the 
different groups in the GNSO.  The arguments against having council 
representation for each constituency in the Council can be applied to the CSG 
and they could be valid, also the arguments for the contrary could also be 
applied to the NCSG.  I think it is a point to be considered and not discarded 
without the comment of the community.
I like Chuck's idea of each member of the group stating if it is in favour or 
against the recommendation.
Best regards,


 Osvaldo Novoa





-----Mensaje original-----
De: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx] En 
nombre de Gomes, Chuck
Enviado el: Martes, 22 de Septiembre de 2015 16:36
Para: Jen Wolfe; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
CC: Amr Elsadr
Asunto: RE: [gnso-review-dt] [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party Draft 
Statement on Westlake Goverance’s Final GNSO Review Report


Looks fine to me Jen.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: Jen Wolfe [mailto:jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 2:43 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Amr Elsadr
Subject: RE: [gnso-review-dt] [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party Draft 
Statement on Westlake Goverance’s Final GNSO Review Report

Thanks, Chuck.  I am attaching a revised version of the draft communication.  I 
accepted Amr's changes and added a few of my own (redlined in the attached 
document).  I also made the formatting/renumbering changes.  I went ahead and 
accepted the formatting changes to keep it easier to read.  Please let me know 
if you have any concerns with the proposed revisions.

If any one else would like to make revisions, please just let us know so we can 
continue to track versions appropriately.  Again, we are targeting to provide 
this draft to council by Thursday before their meeting.  If I don't receive any 
objections, I will provide to staff to circulate to GNSO Council on Thursday 
morning (EDT).

Pending feedback from Council, we will either proceed with providing this to 
the OEC or, if there is objection in the community or from Council, we will 
notify the OEC that there is concern about Revised Recommendation 23 and that a 
more formal statement with be forthcoming, pending time for review and comment.

Thanks again for your continued support of this effort- have a great day!

Jen

JENNIFER C. WOLFE, ESQ., APR, SSBB
FOUNDER & PRESIDENT, WOLFE DOMAIN, A DIGITAL BRAND STRATEGY ADVISORY FIRM 
513.746.2800 X 1 OR CELL 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOP 300 GLOBAL IP STRATEGISTS 
2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand?  : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe 
to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs  http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click 
Z Column  http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group:  gTLD Strategy for Brands 
http://ow.ly/EbloM

-----Original Message-----
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 9:43 AM
To: Jen Wolfe <jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-review-dt] [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party Draft 
Statement on Westlake Goverance’s Final GNSO Review Report

Amr's edits look fine to me.

Jen - I fully support you adding your comments about the other recommendations 
and also restructuring as you think best.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Jen Wolfe
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:49 AM
To: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Amr Elsadr
Subject: FW: [gnso-review-dt] [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party Draft 
Statement on Westlake Goverance’s Final GNSO Review Report

I am forwarding the revised document from Amr.  Thanks, Amr for taking the 
first pass at making revisions noted.  If you plan to make edits, please send a 
quick note around so we can track version control.

I would like to add my suggestion that we include either in the opening, 
conclusion or both that there are 35 other recommendations, many of which there 
is wide spread consensus for support, based upon public comments, and that we, 
as the Working Party will be meeting to discuss recommendations on 
implementation.  Please let me know if that continues to be acceptable to 
everyone.

We still need to restructure the numbering as well, per our discussion.  I'm 
happy to do that.  Please let me know, though, if anyone else wants to make 
substantive changes and I'll wait to make the structure changes and incorporate 
my above comment.  We are targeting delivering this to GNSO Council by 
Thursday, prior to the council meeting.

If anyone from the BC or IPC can offer comments, that would be greatly helpful. 
 There was no one on the last two calls and just want to make sure you do not 
object to this communication.

Thanks so much for your continued support and commitment to this process!

Jen

JENNIFER C. WOLFE, ESQ., APR, SSBB
FOUNDER & PRESIDENT, WOLFE DOMAIN, A DIGITAL BRAND STRATEGY ADVISORY FIRM 
513.746.2800 X 1 OR CELL 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOP 300 GLOBAL IP STRATEGISTS 
2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand?  : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe 
to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs  http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click 
Z Column  http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group:  gTLD Strategy for Brands 
http://ow.ly/EbloM

-----Original Message-----
From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 5:57 PM
To: Jen Wolfe <jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party Draft 
Statement on Westlake Goverance’s Final GNSO Review Report

Hi,

I’ve attached a document to this email with the changes I suggested during 
today’s call, along with a couple more. As suggested by Chuck, I used a clean 
copy of the document following the edits provided by Bill, then made redline 
changes to that so that all changes following today’s call are clearly visible.

Could you please forward this to the working party list for consideration?

Thanks Jen.

Amr



________________________________

El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente 
al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. 
Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente 
respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los 
posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier 
utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad 
que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna 
responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida 
incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información


This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the 
addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender 
immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. 
Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not 
the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any 
communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.