[gnso-review-dt] RE: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party Draft Statement on Westlake Goverance's Final GNSO Review Report

["BRG" <philip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I do feel this recommendation is typical of some of Westlake's approach.
They have studiously avoided structural changes but are now retro-fitting a
good principle (fair representation) on a flawed historic base (different SG
models).

By continuing to look back and not forward, this does the GNSO no favours.

Philip




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Novoa, Osvaldo
Sent: 23 September 2015 16:39
To: 'Gomes, Chuck'; Jen Wolfe; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Amr Elsadr
Subject: RE: [gnso-review-dt] [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party
Draft Statement on Westlake Goverance's Final GNSO Review Report


Hello all,
Although I have not participated in the discussions, I am the alternate to
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben, ISPCP representative, I have been following the
discussion.
I think that the ISPCP cannot share this statement.  First, in our opinion
Westlake work was very good and sugested a lot of improvements.  Second,
regarding Recommendation 23 we are not totally against it, it has some
merit, though we accept that it must be revised considering the
particularities of the different groups in the GNSO.  The arguments against
having council representation for each constituency in the Council can be
applied to the CSG and they could be valid, also the arguments for the
contrary could also be applied to the NCSG.  I think it is a point to be
considered and not discarded without the comment of the community.
I like Chuck's idea of each member of the group stating if it is in favour
or against the recommendation.
Best regards,


 Osvaldo Novoa





-----Mensaje original-----
De: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
En nombre de Gomes, Chuck Enviado el: Martes, 22 de Septiembre de 2015 16:36
Para: Jen Wolfe; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
CC: Amr Elsadr
Asunto: RE: [gnso-review-dt] [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party
Draft Statement on Westlake Goverance's Final GNSO Review Report


Looks fine to me Jen.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: Jen Wolfe [mailto:jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 2:43 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Amr Elsadr
Subject: RE: [gnso-review-dt] [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party
Draft Statement on Westlake Goverance's Final GNSO Review Report

Thanks, Chuck.  I am attaching a revised version of the draft communication.
I accepted Amr's changes and added a few of my own (redlined in the attached
document).  I also made the formatting/renumbering changes.  I went ahead
and accepted the formatting changes to keep it easier to read.  Please let
me know if you have any concerns with the proposed revisions.

If any one else would like to make revisions, please just let us know so we
can continue to track versions appropriately.  Again, we are targeting to
provide this draft to council by Thursday before their meeting.  If I don't
receive any objections, I will provide to staff to circulate to GNSO Council
on Thursday morning (EDT).

Pending feedback from Council, we will either proceed with providing this to
the OEC or, if there is objection in the community or from Council, we will
notify the OEC that there is concern about Revised Recommendation 23 and
that a more formal statement with be forthcoming, pending time for review
and comment.

Thanks again for your continued support of this effort- have a great day!

Jen

JENNIFER C. WOLFE, ESQ., APR, SSBB
FOUNDER & PRESIDENT, WOLFE DOMAIN, A DIGITAL BRAND STRATEGY ADVISORY FIRM
513.746.2800 X 1 OR CELL 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOP 300 GLOBAL IP
STRATEGISTS 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand?  :
http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs
http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column  http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked
In Group:  gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM

-----Original Message-----
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 9:43 AM
To: Jen Wolfe <jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-review-dt] [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party
Draft Statement on Westlake Goverance's Final GNSO Review Report

Amr's edits look fine to me.

Jen - I fully support you adding your comments about the other
recommendations and also restructuring as you think best.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jen Wolfe
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:49 AM
To: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Amr Elsadr
Subject: FW: [gnso-review-dt] [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party
Draft Statement on Westlake Goverance's Final GNSO Review Report

I am forwarding the revised document from Amr.  Thanks, Amr for taking the
first pass at making revisions noted.  If you plan to make edits, please
send a quick note around so we can track version control.

I would like to add my suggestion that we include either in the opening,
conclusion or both that there are 35 other recommendations, many of which
there is wide spread consensus for support, based upon public comments, and
that we, as the Working Party will be meeting to discuss recommendations on
implementation.  Please let me know if that continues to be acceptable to
everyone.

We still need to restructure the numbering as well, per our discussion.  I'm
happy to do that.  Please let me know, though, if anyone else wants to make
substantive changes and I'll wait to make the structure changes and
incorporate my above comment.  We are targeting delivering this to GNSO
Council by Thursday, prior to the council meeting.

If anyone from the BC or IPC can offer comments, that would be greatly
helpful.  There was no one on the last two calls and just want to make sure
you do not object to this communication.

Thanks so much for your continued support and commitment to this process!

Jen

JENNIFER C. WOLFE, ESQ., APR, SSBB
FOUNDER & PRESIDENT, WOLFE DOMAIN, A DIGITAL BRAND STRATEGY ADVISORY FIRM
513.746.2800 X 1 OR CELL 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOP 300 GLOBAL IP
STRATEGISTS 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand?  :
http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs
http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column  http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked
In Group:  gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM

-----Original Message-----
From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 5:57 PM
To: Jen Wolfe <jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party
Draft Statement on Westlake Goverance's Final GNSO Review Report

Hi,

I've attached a document to this email with the changes I suggested during
today's call, along with a couple more. As suggested by Chuck, I used a
clean copy of the document following the edits provided by Bill, then made
redline changes to that so that all changes following today's call are
clearly visible.

Could you please forward this to the working party list for consideration?

Thanks Jen.

Amr



________________________________