<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-review-dt] RE: Follow Up to Council Meeting
- To: Jen Wolfe <jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Follow Up to Council Meeting
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 20:52:30 +0000
I agree on this approach.
Chuck
From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jen Wolfe
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 4:19 PM
To: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Amr Elsadr
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Follow Up to Council Meeting
Hello GNSO Review Working Party,
The draft of the proposed response to the OEC regarding Revised Recommendation
23 was discussed during today's GNSO Council meeting. The Council asked that
we defer sending a formal statement to the OEC until everyone can review and
respond from their respective groups.
I spoke with staff following the Council presentation to confirm timing issues
and wanted to highlight an important point. On Monday, the OEC is just being
briefed by Westlake. They are not taking any action or planning to discuss any
action until their meeting in Dublin. The next step will be for the OEC to
consider the recommendations and determine what action to take.
Accordingly, I recommend that we notify the OEC that the WP and the GNSO
Council have concerns about Revised Recommendation 23, that we are working to
prepare a more formal response and that they delay taking an action on
Recommendation 23 until the community can properly respond.
This would afford the necessary time to go back to your respective groups and
discuss the response and to gain consensus on a written response to the OEC. I
know that everyone is busy and adding on a rushed or urgent important
communication is not in anyone's best interest.
Please let me know if you agree or disagree with this approach.
For next steps, we are working on scheduling one more call before Dublin so
that we can prioritize the other 35 recommendations into what is workable and
feasible versus what may not have consensus or be workable (i.e. Rec. 23 among
some others). We can then head into Dublin to address the response to the OEC.
Thank you again for your continued commitment to this process - it is greatly
appreciated!
jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB
Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm
513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348
IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014
What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P
Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc
Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP
Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|