Re: [gnso-review-dt] Follow Up to Council Meeting

[William Drake <wjdrake@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jen

I agree as well, but also think it’s a pity that the OEC will not know exactly 
what the ‘concerns’ you’ll allude to involve before meeting with Westlake.  
Perhaps you could at least let them know that if they’re curious about what’s 
being discussed but does not yet enjoy consensus can be found at 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-review-dt/msg00406.html? 
<http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-review-dt/msg00406.html?>

Best

Bill 


> On Sep 24, 2015, at 10:52 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I agree on this approach.
>  
> Chuck
>  
> From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx> 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Jen Wolfe
> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 4:19 PM
> To: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Amr Elsadr
> Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Follow Up to Council Meeting
>  
> Hello GNSO Review Working Party,
>  
> The draft of the proposed response to the OEC regarding Revised 
> Recommendation 23 was discussed during today’s GNSO Council meeting.   The 
> Council asked that we defer sending a formal statement to the OEC until 
> everyone can review and respond from their respective groups.
>  
> I spoke with staff following the Council presentation to confirm timing 
> issues and wanted to highlight an important point.  On Monday, the OEC is 
> just  being briefed by Westlake.  They are not taking any action or planning 
> to discuss any action until their meeting in Dublin.  The next step will be 
> for the OEC to consider the recommendations and determine what action to 
> take. 
>  
> Accordingly, I recommend that we notify the OEC that the WP and the GNSO 
> Council have concerns about Revised Recommendation 23, that we are working to 
> prepare a more formal response and that they delay taking an action on 
> Recommendation 23 until the community can properly respond.  
>  
> This would afford the necessary time to go back to your respective groups and 
> discuss the response and to gain consensus on a written response to the OEC.  
> I know that everyone is busy and adding on a rushed or urgent important 
> communication is not in anyone’s best interest. 
>  
> Please let me know if you agree or disagree with this approach. 
>  
> For next steps, we are working on scheduling one more call before Dublin so 
> that we can prioritize the other 35 recommendations into what is workable and 
> feasible versus what may not have consensus or be workable (i.e. Rec. 23 
> among some others).  We can then head into Dublin to address the response to 
> the OEC.
>  
> Thank you again for your continued commitment to this process – it is greatly 
> appreciated! 
>  
>  
>  
> JENNIFER C. WOLFE, ESQ., APR, SSBB
> FOUNDER & PRESIDENT, WOLFE DOMAIN, A DIGITAL BRAND STRATEGY ADVISORY FIRM
> 513.746.2800 X 1 OR CELL 513.238.4348
> IAM 300 - TOP 300 GLOBAL IP STRATEGISTS 2011-2014
> What will you do with your Dot Brand?  : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P 
> <http://ow.ly/Ebl8P>
> Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs  http://ow.ly/Eblgc 
> <http://ow.ly/Eblgc>  
> Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column  http://ow.ly/EbljP <http://ow.ly/EbljP>  
> Linked In Group:  gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM 
> <http://ow.ly/EbloM>
*********************************************************
William J. Drake
International Fellow & Lecturer
  Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
  University of Zurich, Switzerland
Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, 
  ICANN, www.ncuc.org
william.drake@xxxxxx (direct), wjdrake@xxxxxxxxx (lists),
  www.williamdrake.org
Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap http://goo.gl/sRR01q
*********************************************************