Re: [gnso-review-dt] NPOC comments, remarks and statement to the GNSO rec 23.

[William Drake <wjdrake@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 8:10 PM, Jen Wolfe <jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> This is on our agenda for our meeting next Monday in Dublin and agree that 
> unless there is opposition, we should proceed with sending this to the OEC.  
> If there are any groups that oppose the letter, please provide your feedback 
> so we can respond accordingly.

Just one more plea, building on Chuck and Amr’s, that any concerns be stated 
clearly and specifically so that dialogue and consensus building is possible.  
And please do bear in mind that raising concerns about the forced 
generalization of Rec. 23’s model to the entire GNSO does not in any way throw 
into question the operations of those who’ve chosen to follow the model. The 
only issue here is the notion that all parts of the community must conform to 
one model, rather than to approaches suited to their local circumstances.

Bill