[gnso-review-dt] UPDATE YOUR DOODLE POLL TIMES: GNSO Review: Doodle Poll and Revised Prioritization Document
Dear GNSO Review Working Party, If you haven't already done so, please click on the doodle poll<http://doodle.com/poll/27e5twxchd93c92f> link and provide your availability for a call on the 19th. I will close the doodle poll tomorrow by 23:59 UTC. Below is a snapshot of the responses received so far: [cid:image001.jpg@01D14EA4.0DF8FE80] From: Charla Shambley Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 2:12 PM To: 'gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx' <gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: UPDATE YOUR DOODLE POLL TIMES: GNSO Review: Doodle Poll and Revised Prioritization Document Dear GNSO Review Working Party, I have received limited responses to our doodle poll<http://doodle.com/poll/27e5twxchd93c92f>. Please click on the link and provide your availability for a call on 19 January (please update your availability if you provided a response to the earlier doodle poll since the options have changed). We would like to be able to schedule a WP call prior to the Council meeting on the 21st. I will close the doodle poll<http://doodle.com/poll/27e5twxchd93c92f> on Friday, 15 January. Also, if you have feedback on the recommendations that you would like to provide prior to the call, please feel free to send an email to the mailing list. I am attaching Chuck's comments that he sent to the WP on 30 December for ease of reference. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Charla From: Charla Shambley Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 8:49 AM To: 'gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx' <gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>> Subject: PLEASE UPDATE YOUR DOODLE POLL TIMES: GNSO Review: Doodle Poll and Revised Prioritization Document Dear Working Party, Please take a minute to update your doodle poll<http://doodle.com/poll/27e5twxchd93c92f> responses. I added additional options for a call on 19 January and so far only one person has provided his availability. I can keep the poll open through Monday to allow everyone time to update their responses. Have a great weekend! Charla From: Charla Shambley Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 10:29 AM To: 'gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx' <gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>> Subject: NEW DOODLE POLL TIMES: GNSO Review: Doodle Poll and Revised Prioritization Document Dear GNSO Review Working Party - Due to some scheduling conflicts, I have added options to the doodle poll<http://doodle.com/poll/27e5twxchd93c92f> for a call on 19 January. Many of you have already provided your availability but I ask that you go in and update your responses. I will keep the doodle poll<http://doodle.com/poll/27e5twxchd93c92f> open through Friday, 8 January. Thank you and sorry for any inconvenience. Charla From: Charla Shambley Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 9:33 AM To: 'gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx' <gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>> Subject: DOODLE POLL REMINDER: GNSO Review: Doodle Poll and Revised Prioritization Document Dear GNSO Review Working Party - I hope this email finds you well and that you enjoyed your holidays! This email is a reminder, if you haven't already done so, to participate in the doodle poll<http://doodle.com/poll/27e5twxchd93c92f> so that we can schedule our next call. I will close the poll on Wednesday, 6 January. Regards, Charla From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx> [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charla Shambley Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 11:57 AM To: 'gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx' <gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>> Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review: Doodle Poll and Revised Prioritization Document Dear GNSO Review Working Party: I have set up a doodle poll<http://doodle.com/poll/27e5twxchd93c92f> for a one hour call mid-January. Please complete this poll by 6 January so that I can have the call details sent out for your calendar. In preparation for the call, attached you will find an updated Excel document that provides an initial score and ranks each of the recommendations based on the criteria we have been using (ease, cost, strategic direction alignment, impact on other groups/work, additional info, and priority). During our next call, we will be able to easily re-sort them according to the Working Party's suggested prioritization. Also, you will note that Jen provided language for the recommendations highlighted in yellow (see column D). We can review and modify/refine the language, if necessary, on the call as well. Please let me know if you have any questions. Happy holidays to everyone! Charla Charla K. Shambley Strategic Initiatives Program Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 310-745-1943 Attachment:
GNSO Review Rec Prioritization - 24 Dec 2015.xlsx Attachment:
Gomes Suggestions for GNSO Review Working Party Discussion 30 Dec 2015.docx |