ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-review-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Update and Doodle Poll

  • To: "'gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx'" <gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Update and Doodle Poll
  • From: Charla Shambley <charla.shambley@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 01:03:46 +0000

Dear GNSO Review Working Party,

First, we'd like to update you on the timeline.  To allow for additional time 
for you to complete your evaluation of the 36 recommendations, the OEC will 
defer their consideration until  ICANN 55.  Additionally,  it has been 
suggested that the Feasibility Assessment and Prioritization of Final 
Recommendations that will result from your work be voted on by the GNSO Council 
prior to being considered for action by the full Board.

Staff has been coordinating these plans with Jen and because of the extensive 
work you already completed on the assessment of recommendations, we estimate 
that one more Working Party meeting will be sufficient to complete the work in 
preparation for the Council meeting.

Below is a projected timeline through June.  As you can see, in order for us to 
meet these dates, the Working Party must submit its report to Council by 8 
February for the 18 February Council Meeting.

[cid:image003.png@01D15536.26CCDC90]

I have set up a doodle poll<http://doodle.com/poll/57cztmtcdb95kqf2> for a one 
hour call during the first week of February.  Please complete this poll by 27 
January so that I can have the call details sent to your calendar.

In preparation for the call, attached you will find an Excel document that 
provides an initial score and ranks each of the recommendations based on the 
criteria we have been using (ease, cost, strategic direction alignment, impact 
on other groups/work, additional info, and priority).  During our call, we will 
be able to easily re-sort the recommendations according to the Working Party's 
suggested prioritization.

Jen provided language for the recommendations highlighted in yellow (see column 
D).  We can review and modify/refine the language, if necessary, on the call as 
well.  I am attaching Chuck's comments that he sent to the WP on 30 December 
for ease of reference.  If you want to provide feedback on the recommendations 
prior to the call, please feel free to send an email to the mailing list.

Regards,

Charla


Charla K. Shambley
Strategic Initiatives Program Manager
ICANN
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA  90094
310-745-1943

PNG image

Attachment: GNSO Review Rec Prioritization - 24 Dec 2015.xlsx
Description: GNSO Review Rec Prioritization - 24 Dec 2015.xlsx

Attachment: Gomes Suggestions for GNSO Review Working Party Discussion 30 Dec 2015.docx
Description: Gomes Suggestions for GNSO Review Working Party Discussion 30 Dec 2015.docx



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy